This week's picks

Big Ten quarterbacks: 2026 College Football Chart

College Football Charts
Data updatedOct 31, 2026

Share as an image

Image style

Big Ten quarterbacks: EPA per play vs. passing success rate

23 Big Ten quarterbacks. Season so far, games through Oct 24, 2026. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better on both.

From the play-by-play. Players with 30+ pass attempts, 15+ carries, 8+ catches, a sack, an interception or a fumble recovery this season; these stats also need 25+ plays and 50+ dropbacks. Labels mark the best on both stats and anyone you highlight. Hover or tap a dot for the numbers.

What this shows

Each dot is one of 23 Big Ten quarterbacks, placed by epa per play (across) and passing success rate (up). The share of dropbacks (attempts plus sacks) that are successful plays. A successful play gains 50% of the yards needed on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, and all of it on 3rd and 4th. The dashed lines are the averages: 0.24 and 46.0%.

There is strong relationship here (r = +0.80; r runs from −1 to +1). Players who are better at one tend to be better at the other. One explains about 64% of the differences in the other.

10 of 23 (43%) are above average on both. 1 are above average only on epa per play, 0 only on passing success rate, and 12 on neither.

Where the data comes from. Play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Oct 24, 2026. Every stat here is computed from those plays.

Best on both

  1. Aidan Chiles, Northwestern: 0.54 EPA per play, 55.1% passing success rate
  2. Julian Sayin, Ohio State: 0.49 EPA per play, 54.6% passing success rate
  3. Elijah Brown, Washington: 0.45 EPA per play, 52.1% passing success rate
  4. Jayden Maiava, USC: 0.34 EPA per play, 55.2% passing success rate
  5. Josh Hoover, Indiana: 0.50 EPA per play, 48.5% passing success rate
  6. Katin Houser, Illinois: 0.34 EPA per play, 51.8% passing success rate

Great at one, not the other

  1. Jayden Maiava, USC: 0.34 EPA per play, 55.2% passing success rate
  2. Josh Hoover, Indiana: 0.50 EPA per play, 48.5% passing success rate
  3. Anthony Colandrea, Nebraska: 0.34 EPA per play, 44.2% passing success rate
  4. AJ Surace, Rutgers: 0.22 EPA per play, 40.7% passing success rate
  5. Alessio Milivojevic, Michigan State: 0.07 EPA per play, 44.6% passing success rate
  6. Dylan Raiola, Oregon: 0.03 EPA per play, 43.2% passing success rate

About the stats on this chart

Why does EPA per play matter?

EPA per play values every dropback and run by how much it changed the scoring outlook. It's the quarterback stat the analytics crowd trusts most.

Where does the EPA per play data come from?

From play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Oct 24, 2026.

What is passing success rate?

The share of dropbacks (attempts plus sacks) that are successful plays. A successful play gains 50% of the yards needed on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, and all of it on 3rd and 4th.

Why does passing success rate matter?

Passing success rate is the share of dropbacks that keep the offense on schedule, sacks included. It counts the bad plays, which yards don't.

Where does the passing success rate data come from?

From play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Oct 24, 2026.