The numbers saySMU72% chance to win
Virginia Tech at SMU
Projected score: Virginia Tech 25, SMU 31 (total 56).SP+: SMU by 6.9, 69% chance to win.PRIME: SMU by 5.2.
| Margin | Win chance | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SP+ | SMU by 6.9 | 69% | 56 |
| PRIME | SMU by 5.2 | 64% | |
| Elo | SMU | 84% | |
| The line | SMU −7.5 | 57.5 |
Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Sat, Oct 31, 7:21 PM ET.
Compare the odds at every sportsbook and build a parlay on CFB Parlay Calculator.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor.
Where the game is won
All three ratings favor SMU, by 5.2 to 6.9 points. SMU's best matchup is its run-stopping front, 29th in line yards allowed per carry, against Virginia Tech's offensive line at 127th. Virginia Tech's way back in is its run-stopping front, 1st in line yards allowed per carry, against SMU's offensive line at 98th.
Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Injuries and availability
Virginia Tech
SMUStatuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Virginia Tech and SMU are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 31, 2026.
The players in charts
The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 31, 2026.
RatingsSMU 9–1
On a neutral field, SP+ has SMU 4.4 points better (21st to 38th). PRIME also has SMU ahead, by 2.7. Elo, which only sees results, also has SMU ahead (27th to 62nd).
Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.
Opponent-adjustedSMU 10–6
Virginia Tech's offense ranks 40th in adjusted EPA per play, and the SMU defense it faces ranks 81st in EPA per play allowed. SMU's offense ranks 42nd against Virginia Tech's 100th-ranked defense. Both offenses have the edge on the defenses they face. The biggest edge on the board is SMU's passing game: 21st in adjusted EPA per pass, against Virginia Tech's 99th-ranked defense. That's a mismatch. Adjust for opponents and Virginia Tech's defense falls from 56th to 100th in EPA per play allowed: a lot of that came against soft offenses.
The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.
EPASMU 6–1
Virginia Tech is better throwing (29th in EPA per pass) than running (89th). SMU's pass defense ranks 37th. SMU is better throwing (5th in EPA per pass) than running (80th). Virginia Tech's pass defense ranks 83rd, so that's a mismatch. On third down, SMU has the edge: its offense ranks 15th in EPA per third-down play, and the defense it faces ranks 105th.
Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.
ScoringEven 1–1
Virginia Tech outscores FBS opponents by 14.5 a game, and SMU by 13.0. Virginia Tech's offense ranks 27th in scoring, and the SMU defense it faces ranks 53rd in points allowed. SMU's offense ranks 26th against Virginia Tech's 35th-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is Virginia Tech's offense against SMU's defense.
Per game, FBS opponents only.
Offense
SMU's best matchup is big plays: its offense ranks 25th in explosive play rate, and Virginia Tech's defense ranks 92nd in explosive plays allowed. That's a mismatch.
Per game and per play, from play-by-play.
DefenseSMU 6–5
Virginia Tech's defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 22nd in yards per carry allowed, and SMU's offense is middle of the pack in yards per carry (85th). That's a mismatch.
What opponents managed against them.
Up frontEven 6–6
They split these evenly, 6 each. The biggest gap is front-seven havoc allowed, where SMU ranks 53rd and Virginia Tech 112th.
The lines. Big Uglies is our rating for each offensive line and each defensive front: adjusted line yards (30%), stuff rate (20%), power success (15%), sack rate (20%) and front-seven havoc (15%), against every FBS team. 50 is average, and every 10 points is a standard deviation. Line stats from CollegeFootballData.com, garbage time out.
TurnoversSMU 3–0
Per game, from play-by-play.
TalentVirginia Tech 6–5
Virginia Tech has the more talented roster (27th in the 247Sports talent composite; SMU is 31st). But SMU plays further above its talent: +7.0 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to Virginia Tech's +2.3.
247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.
MoneySMU 2–1
SMU's roster is valued at $22.4M, Virginia Tech's at $22.3M. SMU also plays better per dollar: +5.8 points of SP+ above what its payroll predicts, to +1.5 for Virginia Tech.
NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.
RECEIPTSVirginia Tech 3–1
Virginia Tech is +2.0 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is roster (+0.9). SMU is +2.0 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (+1.0).
Where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.
FAQ
The numbers pick SMU, 72% chance to win. All three ratings favor the same team. SMU's best matchup is its run-stopping front, 29th in line yards allowed per carry, against Virginia Tech's offensive line at 127th.
Fri, Nov 6, 7:00 PM ET at Gerald J. Ford Stadium. It's on ESPN.
SP+ projects SMU 31–25. That's from this season's SP+ offense, defense and special teams ratings, with home field worth 2.5 points.
DraftKings has SMU −7.5, total 57.5. The numbers pick winners, not bets.
SMU leads 2–1. Last meeting: SMU won 28–25 in 1974.
Virginia Tech: Ethan Grunkemeyer (2,204 passing yards) and Que'Sean Brown (719 receiving yards). SMU: Kevin Jennings (2,441 passing yards), Kendrick Raphael (683 rushing yards) and Yamir Knight (474 receiving yards). Season totals through Oct 31, 2026.
Virginia Tech's is Ethan Grunkemeyer (2,204 passing yards this season); SMU's is Kevin Jennings (2,441 passing yards this season).
Keep going
The CFB Charts newsletter drops Thursdays and Mondays. On Thursdays, we make picks, highlight key matchups and dig into some data. On Mondays, we talk about what worked, what didn't and who we like to win it all.
at
Kentucky at 24% chance to win
Delaware at Kennesaw StateNumbers through the games of Oct 31, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor.
Where the game is won
Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Injuries and availability
Statuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
The players in charts
FAQ
Keep going
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.