91% chance to win
Rutgers is without QB Dylan Lonergan (1,066 passing yards). Rutgers has played one game without Lonergan and lost it by 7 (it lost by 4 ppg with him). One game isn't enough to know yet.
Rutgers at Wisconsin
Projected score: Rutgers 17, Wisconsin 33 (total 50).SP+: Wisconsin by 16.1, 87% chance to win.PRIME: Wisconsin by 27.6.
| Margin | Win chance | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SP+ | Wisconsin by 16.1 | 87% | 50 |
| PRIME | Wisconsin by 27.6 | 98% | |
| Elo | Wisconsin | 88% |
Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. No line posted yet.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor.
Where the game is won
All three ratings favor Wisconsin, by 16.1 to 27.6 points, and it isn't close. Wisconsin's best matchup is its run game, 32nd in EPA per rush, against Rutgers' run defense at 132nd. Rutgers doesn't have a unit with a clear edge over the one it faces. We left out the edges built on Lonergan, who's out.
Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Injuries and availability
Statuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Rutgers and Wisconsin are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 31, 2026.
The players in charts
The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 31, 2026.
RatingsWisconsin 8–2
On a neutral field, SP+ has Wisconsin 13.6 points better (40th to 95th). PRIME also has Wisconsin ahead, by 25.1. Elo, which only sees results, also has Wisconsin ahead (40th to 97th).
Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.
Opponent-adjustedWisconsin 12–4
Rutgers' offense ranks 82nd in adjusted EPA per play, and the Wisconsin defense it faces ranks 3rd in EPA per play allowed. Wisconsin's offense ranks 57th against Rutgers' 126th-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is Wisconsin's offense against Rutgers' defense. The biggest edge on the board is Wisconsin's run game: 32nd in adjusted EPA per rush, against Rutgers' 132nd-ranked defense. That's a mismatch. Adjust for opponents and Wisconsin's offense climbs from 79th to 57th in EPA per play: it has done its work against good defenses.
The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.
EPAWisconsin 6–1
Rutgers is better throwing (58th in EPA per pass) than running (89th). Wisconsin's pass defense ranks 6th, so the defense has the better of it. Wisconsin is better running (34th in EPA per rush) than throwing (110th). Rutgers' run defense ranks 133rd, so that's a mismatch. On third down, Wisconsin has the edge: its offense ranks 58th in EPA per third-down play, and the defense it faces ranks 109th.
Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.
ScoringEven 1–1
Rutgers is outscored by 4.8 a game, and Wisconsin by 6.5. Rutgers' offense ranks 73rd in scoring, and the Wisconsin defense it faces ranks 19th in points allowed. Wisconsin's offense ranks 97th against Rutgers' 127th-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is Wisconsin's offense against Rutgers' defense.
Per game, FBS opponents only.
OffenseRutgers 8–4
Rutgers' best matchup is third downs: its offense ranks 40th in 3rd down conversion rate, and Wisconsin's defense ranks 70th in 3rd down conversions allowed. Wisconsin's best matchup is third downs: its offense ranks 34th in 3rd down conversion rate, and Rutgers' defense ranks 108th in 3rd down conversions allowed. That's a mismatch.
Per game and per play, from play-by-play.
DefenseWisconsin 11–0
Rutgers' defense is best placed to pick off passes: it ranks 89th in interception rate, and Wisconsin's offense is bottom-20 at avoiding interceptions (116th). Wisconsin's defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 6th in yards per carry allowed, and Rutgers' offense is middle of the pack in yards per carry (74th). That's a mismatch.
What opponents managed against them.
Up frontRutgers 7–5
Rutgers has the better number in 7 of 12. The biggest gap is line yards allowed per carry, where Wisconsin ranks 48th and Rutgers 113th.
The lines. Big Uglies is our rating for each offensive line and each defensive front: adjusted line yards (30%), stuff rate (20%), power success (15%), sack rate (20%) and front-seven havoc (15%), against every FBS team. 50 is average, and every 10 points is a standard deviation. Line stats from CollegeFootballData.com, garbage time out.
TurnoversWisconsin 6–1
Wisconsin is +0.3 in turnover margin a game and Rutgers is −1.0. At about five points a turnover, that's roughly a 6-point edge for Wisconsin. Turnover margin rarely holds from one month to the next, so don't count on it.
Per game, from play-by-play.
TalentRutgers 6–4
Wisconsin has the more talented roster (30th in the 247Sports talent composite; Rutgers is 48th). Wisconsin also plays further above its talent: +2.1 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to Rutgers' −7.8.
247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.
MoneyWisconsin 3–0
Rutgers' roster is valued at $20.9M, Wisconsin's at $20.8M. Dollar for dollar, Wisconsin plays better: +2.7 points of SP+ above what its payroll predicts, to −11.1 for Rutgers.
NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.
RECEIPTSWisconsin 4–1
Rutgers is −2.0 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (−1.1). Wisconsin is +1.0 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is schedule (−0.7).
Where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.
FAQ
The numbers pick Wisconsin, 91% chance to win. All three ratings favor the same team. Wisconsin's best matchup is its run game, 32nd in EPA per rush, against Rutgers' run defense at 132nd.
Sat, Nov 7, 12:30 PM ET at Camp Randall Stadium. It's on BTN.
SP+ projects Wisconsin 33–17. That's from this season's SP+ offense, defense and special teams ratings, with home field worth 2.5 points.
Wisconsin leads 6–0. Last meeting: Wisconsin won 42–7 in 2024.
Rutgers: Lonergan (1,066 passing yards), Antwan Raymond (742 rushing yards) and KJ Duff (774 receiving yards). Wisconsin: Colton Joseph (1,350 passing yards), Abu Sama III (305 rushing yards) and Tyrell Henry (346 receiving yards). Season totals through Oct 31, 2026.
Rutgers' is Lonergan (1,066 passing yards this season); Wisconsin's is Colton Joseph (1,350 passing yards this season).
Rutgers: Lonergan (QB), out.
Keep going
The CFB Charts newsletter drops Thursdays and Mondays. On Thursdays, we make picks, highlight key matchups and dig into some data. On Mondays, we talk about what worked, what didn't and who we like to win it all.
at
Kentucky at 24% chance to win
Delaware at Kennesaw StateNumbers through the games of Oct 31, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor.
Where the game is won
Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Injuries and availability
Statuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
The players in charts
FAQ
Keep going
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.