80% chance to win
TCU at Arizona
Projected score: TCU 17, Arizona 27 (total 44).SP+: Arizona by 9.9, 76% chance to win.PRIME: Arizona by 13.7.
| Margin | Win chance | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SP+ | Arizona by 9.9 | 76% | 44 |
| PRIME | Arizona by 13.7 | 84% | |
| Elo | Arizona | 81% |
Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. No line posted yet.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor.
Where the game is won
All three ratings favor Arizona, by 9.9 to 13.7 points, and it isn't close. Arizona's best matchup is its run defense, 32nd in EPA per rush allowed, against TCU's run game at 135th. TCU's way back in is its 3rd down offense, 41st in 3rd down conversion, against Arizona's 3rd down defense at 109th.
Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Injuries and availability
Statuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; TCU and Arizona are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 31, 2026.
The players in charts
The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 31, 2026.
RatingsArizona 6–4
On a neutral field, SP+ has Arizona 7.4 points better (14th to 41st). PRIME also has Arizona ahead, by 11.2. Elo, which only sees results, also has Arizona ahead (17th to 49th).
Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.
Opponent-adjustedArizona 10–6
TCU's offense ranks 114th in adjusted EPA per play, and the Arizona defense it faces ranks 17th in EPA per play allowed. Arizona's offense ranks 26th against TCU's 6th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge.
The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.
EPAArizona 5–3
TCU is better throwing (58th in EPA per pass) than running (131st). Arizona's pass defense ranks 8th, so the defense has the better of it. Arizona is better throwing (12th in EPA per pass) than running (47th). TCU's pass defense ranks 19th, so that's strength on strength.
Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.
ScoringEven 1–1
TCU outscores FBS opponents by 9.1 a game, and Arizona by 16.0. TCU's offense ranks 100th in scoring, and the Arizona defense it faces ranks 27th in points allowed. Arizona's offense ranks 29th against TCU's 8th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge.
Per game, FBS opponents only.
OffenseArizona 7–5
TCU's best matchup is third downs: its offense ranks 41st in 3rd down conversion rate, and Arizona's defense ranks 109th in 3rd down conversions allowed. That's a mismatch. Arizona has no clear edge here. Its best is 3rd down conversion rate, 48th, against a defense ranked 15th in 3rd down conversions allowed.
Per game and per play, from play-by-play.
DefenseTCU 10–1
TCU's defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 12th in yards per carry allowed, and Arizona's offense is middle of the pack in yards per carry (80th). That's a mismatch. Arizona's defense is best placed to get home: it ranks 16th in sack rate, and TCU's offense is bottom-40 at avoiding sacks (111th). That's a mismatch.
What opponents managed against them.
Up frontArizona 10–2
Arizona has the better number in 10 of 12. The biggest gap is second-level yards per carry, where Arizona ranks 15th and TCU 127th.
The lines. Big Uglies is our rating for each offensive line and each defensive front: adjusted line yards (30%), stuff rate (20%), power success (15%), sack rate (20%) and front-seven havoc (15%), against every FBS team. 50 is average, and every 10 points is a standard deviation. Line stats from CollegeFootballData.com, garbage time out.
TurnoversEven 3–3
Neither team has a real turnover edge: TCU is −0.4 a game and Arizona −0.3. Fumble recoveries are mostly luck, and TCU's takeaways lean on them (0.7 of 1.3 a game).
Per game, from play-by-play.
TalentArizona 6–4
TCU has the more talented roster (39th in the 247Sports talent composite; Arizona is 54th). But Arizona plays further above its talent: +13.7 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to TCU's +4.3.
247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.
MoneyArizona 3–0
TCU's roster is valued at $20.1M, Arizona's at $19.9M. Dollar for dollar, Arizona plays better: +10.9 points of SP+ above what its payroll predicts, to +3.3 for TCU.
NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.
RECEIPTSArizona 4–1
TCU is 0.0 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is luck (−1.4). Arizona is +2.0 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (+1.5). TCU's record is 1.4 wins worse than its play on bad luck, so it's better than the record says.
Where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.
FAQ
The numbers pick Arizona, 80% chance to win. All three ratings favor the same team. Arizona's best matchup is its run defense, 32nd in EPA per rush allowed, against TCU's run game at 135th.
Fri, Nov 6, 10:15 PM ET at Arizona Stadium. It's on ESPN.
SP+ projects Arizona 27–17. That's from this season's SP+ offense, defense and special teams ratings, with home field worth 2.5 points.
TCU leads 2–1. Last meeting: TCU won 49–28 in 2024.
TCU: Jaden Craig (2,084 passing yards), Jeremy Payne (382 rushing yards) and Ed Small (522 receiving yards). Arizona: Noah Fifita (2,477 passing yards), Kedrick Reescano (310 rushing yards) and Isaiah Mizell (677 receiving yards). Season totals through Oct 31, 2026.
TCU's is Jaden Craig (2,084 passing yards this season); Arizona's is Noah Fifita (2,477 passing yards this season).
Keep going
The CFB Charts newsletter drops Thursdays and Mondays. On Thursdays, we make picks, highlight key matchups and dig into some data. On Mondays, we talk about what worked, what didn't and who we like to win it all.
at
Kentucky at 24% chance to win
Delaware at Kennesaw StateNumbers through the games of Oct 31, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor.
Where the game is won
Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Injuries and availability
Statuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
The players in charts
FAQ
Keep going
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.