The numbers sayOle Miss61% chance to win
Updated
Ole Miss at Oklahoma
Projected score: Ole Miss 25, Oklahoma 22 (total 47).SP+: Ole Miss by 3.2, 59% chance to win.PRIME: Ole Miss by 2.8.
| Margin | Win chance | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SP+ | Ole Miss by 3.2 | 59% | 47 |
| PRIME | Ole Miss by 2.8 | 58% | |
| Elo | Ole Miss | 66% | |
| The line | Oklahoma −1.5, opened −4 | 49.5, opened 53.5 |
Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Thu, Nov 12, 10:24 PM ET.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team they favor on average.
| Sportsbook | Ole Miss spread | Oklahoma spread | Over | Under | Ole Miss moneyline | Oklahoma moneyline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | +1.5 −118 | −1.5 −102 | 49.5 −108 | 49.5 −112 | −108 | −112 |
| FanDuel | −1.5 +100 | +1.5 −120 (best price) | 49.5 −110 | 49.5 −110 | −108 | −110 |
| BetMGM | +1 −110 | −1 −108 | 49.5 −105 | 49.5 −112 | −108 | −110 |
| Caesars | +1 −109 | −1 −110 | 49.5 −112 | 49.5 −108 (best price) | −109 | −109 (best price) |
| ESPN BET | +1.5 −115 (best price) | −1.5 −105 | 49.5 −110 | 49.5 −110 | −110 | −110 |
| BetRivers | −1 −109 | +1 −114 | 49.5 −113 | 49.5 −110 | −114 | −109 (best price) |
| Hard Rock Bet | −1.5 +100 | +1.5 −120 (best price) | 49.5 −110 | 49.5 −110 | −115 | −110 |
| Fanatics | +1 −110 | −1 −110 | 49 −110 (best price) | 49 −110 | −105 (best price) | −115 |
Odds updated Thu., Nov. 12, 10:24 PM ET. The best price on each bet is marked. Prices move fast, so check the book before you bet. Compare the odds at every sportsbook and build a parlay on CFB Parlay Calculator.
Where the game is won
All three ratings favor Ole Miss, by 2.8 to 3.2 points. Ole Miss' best matchup is their takeaway defense, 61st in interceptions per pass, against Oklahoma's ball security at 95th. Oklahoma's way back in is their takeaway defense, 11th in interceptions per pass, against Ole Miss' ball security at 100th.
Oklahoma
Oklahoma
OklahomaEach row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026; CollegeFootballData.com advanced stats, games through Nov 12, 2026.
Recent form
3–2 in the last five.
Oklahoma3–2 in the last five.
Each team's last five games before this one, most recent first.
Injuries and availability
OklahomaWith Winfield, Louisiana went 5–3 and won by 5.3 a game. Without him, this game included, they went 1–0 and won by 21.0 a game.
Where the data comes from. Scores and who played each game from CollegeFootballData.com, games through Nov 12, 2026.
| Week | Opponent | Score | Margin | Winfield played? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | at USC | 30–49 | −19.0 | Yes |
| 3 | vs. UAB | 21–14 | +7.0 | Yes |
| 4 | at Charlotte | 34–7 | +27.0 | Yes |
| 5 | vs. Arkansas State | 23–20 | +3.0 | Yes |
| 6 | at Louisiana Tech | 31–32 | −1.0 | Yes |
| 7 | vs. Troy | 33–6 | +27.0 | Yes |
| 8 | at Southern Miss | 31–35 | −4.0 | Yes |
| 10 | vs. South Alabama | 28–26 | +2.0 | Yes |
| 11 | at UL Monroe | 42–21 | +21.0 | No |
With Armenta, UL Monroe went 2–5 and lost by 17.6 a game. Without him, this game included, they went 0–2 and lost by 13.5 a game. Yards per play: 5.4 with him, 4.3 without.
Where the data comes from. Scores and who played each game from CollegeFootballData.com, games through Nov 12, 2026.
| Week | Opponent | Score | Margin | Armenta played? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | at Mississippi State | 13–62 | −49.0 | Yes |
| 2 | at UAB | 20–26 | −6.0 | No |
| 4 | vs. Florida Atlantic | 17–45 | −28.0 | Yes |
| 5 | at South Alabama | 35–52 | −17.0 | Yes |
| 7 | vs. Louisiana Tech | 0–24 | −24.0 | Yes |
| 8 | at Troy | 21–14 | +7.0 | Yes |
| 9 | vs. Southern Miss | 21–35 | −14.0 | Yes |
| 10 | at Arkansas State | 19–17 | +2.0 | Yes |
| 11 | vs. Louisiana | 21–42 | −21.0 | No |
Statuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Ole Miss and Oklahoma are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Nov 12, 2026.
The players in charts
The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Nov 12, 2026.
RatingsOle Miss 7–3
On a neutral field, SP+ has Ole Miss 5.7 points better (30th to 45th). PRIME also has Ole Miss ahead, by 5.3. Elo, which only sees results, also has Ole Miss ahead (11th to 33rd).
Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.
Where the data comes from: SP+ by Bill Connelly (CFB Update), last pulled Nov 11, 2026; PRIME (primecfb.com), updated Nov 11, 2026; Elo from CollegeFootballData.com, games through Nov 12, 2026.
Opponent-adjustedOle Miss 10–6
Ole Miss' offense ranks 12th in adjusted EPA per play, and the Oklahoma defense it faces ranks 3rd in EPA per play allowed. Oklahoma's offense ranks 79th against Ole Miss' 67th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge. Adjust for opponents and Ole Miss' defense climbs from 110th to 67th in EPA per play allowed: it has done its work against good offenses.
The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.
Where the data comes from: CollegeFootballData.com advanced stats, games through Nov 12, 2026.
EPAEven 4–4
Ole Miss is about as good throwing (44th in EPA per pass) as running (31st). Oklahoma is better throwing (62nd in EPA per pass) than running (135th). Ole Miss' pass defense ranks 87th, so that's an edge.
Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.
Where the data comes from: CollegeFootballData.com advanced stats, games through Nov 12, 2026.
ScoringEven 1–1
Ole Miss outscores FBS opponents by 7.8 a game, and Oklahoma by 2.9. Ole Miss' offense ranks 30th in scoring, and the Oklahoma defense it faces ranks 24th in points allowed. Oklahoma's offense ranks 107th against Ole Miss' 81st-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge.
Per game, FBS opponents only.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026.
OffenseOle Miss 9–3
Ole Miss has no clear edge here. Their best is success rate, 21st, against a defense ranked 11th in success rate allowed. Oklahoma's best matchup is third downs: their offense ranks 80th in 3rd down conversion rate, and Ole Miss' defense ranks 120th in 3rd down conversions allowed.
Per game and per play, from play-by-play.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026.
DefenseOklahoma 11–0
Ole Miss' defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 86th in yards per carry allowed, and Oklahoma's offense is bottom-20 in yards per carry (134th). Oklahoma's defense is best placed to pick off passes: it ranks 11th in interception rate, and Ole Miss' offense is bottom-40 at avoiding interceptions (100th). That's a mismatch.
What opponents managed against them.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026.
Up frontOle Miss 8–4
Ole Miss has the better number in 8 of 12. The biggest gap is big Uglies: offensive line, where Ole Miss ranks 16th and Oklahoma 101st.
The lines. Big Uglies is our rating for each offensive line and each defensive front: adjusted line yards (30%), stuff rate (20%), power success (15%), sack rate (20%) and front-seven havoc (15%), against every FBS team. 50 is average, and every 10 points is a standard deviation. Line stats from CollegeFootballData.com, garbage time out.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026.
TurnoversEven 3–3
Neither team has a real turnover edge: Ole Miss is −0.2 a game and Oklahoma −0.2.
Per game, from play-by-play.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026.
TalentOklahoma 7–4
Ole Miss has the more talented roster (14th in the 247Sports talent composite; Oklahoma is 17th). Ole Miss also plays further above their talent: −0.1 points of SP+ beyond what their roster predicts, to Oklahoma's −3.8.
247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.
Where the data comes from: 247Sports, preseason; 247Sports talent composite against SP+ (last pulled Nov 11, 2026); CollegeFootballData.com returning production, preseason; 247Sports recruiting rankings, via CollegeFootballData.com.
MoneyOle Miss 3–0
Ole Miss' roster is valued at $34.1M, Oklahoma's at $32.6M. Ole Miss also plays better per dollar: −3.1 points of SP+ above what their payroll predicts, to −7.8 for Oklahoma.
NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.
Where the data comes from: The NIL Standard, preseason estimates; The NIL Standard's preseason roster values against this season's results.
RECEIPTSOle Miss 5–0
Ole Miss is +1.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is schedule (−1.7). Oklahoma is +0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is schedule (−1.8). Ole Miss' record is running 1.1 wins ahead of their play on luck alone, so they're not as good as the record says.
Where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.
Where the data comes from: our split of every game result, games through Nov 12, 2026, using SP+ (last pulled Nov 11, 2026), the 247Sports talent composite and CollegeFootballData.com returning production.
The trip
It's Ole Miss' 5th road trip of the season. Counting this one, they'll have traveled 3,873 miles, there and back, 99th of 138 in FBS.
The shortest chain of real results this season that “proves” each team wins.
Ole Miss wins
Oklahoma wins
Each arrow in a chain is a win, with the score and the week. At a neutral site, both teams travel.
Where the data comes from: CollegeFootballData.com schedules and results, games through Nov 12, 2026. Miles as the crow flies, campus to stadium.
FAQ
The numbers pick Ole Miss, 61% chance to win. All three ratings favor the same team. Ole Miss' best matchup is their takeaway defense, 61st in interceptions per pass, against Oklahoma's ball security at 95th.
Sat, Nov 14, 4:15 PM ET at Memorial Stadium (Norman, OK). It's on SEC Network.
SP+ projects Ole Miss 25–22. That's from this season's SP+ offense, defense and special teams ratings, with home field worth 2.5 points.
DraftKings has Oklahoma −1.5, total 49.5. The numbers pick winners, not bets.
Ole Miss leads 3–0. Last meeting: Ole Miss won 34–26 in 2025.
Ole Miss: Trinidad Chambliss (2,359 passing yards), Lacy (388 rushing yards) and Deuce Alexander (669 receiving yards). Oklahoma: John Mateer (2,042 passing yards), Lloyd Avant (394 rushing yards) and Isaiah Sategna (625 receiving yards). Season totals through Nov 12, 2026.
Ole Miss' is Trinidad Chambliss (2,359 passing yards this season); Oklahoma's is John Mateer (2,042 passing yards this season).
Ole Miss: Lacy (RB), out.
Keep going
The best charts from the site, by email. Free. Unsubscribe whenever.
Numbers through the games of Nov 12, 2026. SP+ as of Nov 11, 2026. Updated every week.
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team they favor on average.
Where the game is won
Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Recent form
Each team's last five games before this one, most recent first.
Injuries and availability
Statuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
The players in charts
FAQ
Keep going
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.