The numbers sayLSU55% chance to win
Updated
Texas at LSU
Projected score: Texas 22, LSU 24 (total 47).SP+: LSU by 1.9, 55% chance to win.PRIME: LSU by 3.8.
| Margin | Win chance | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SP+ | LSU by 1.9 | 55% | 47 |
| PRIME | LSU by 3.8 | 61% | |
| Elo | LSU | 50% | |
| The line | LSU −4, opened Texas −2.5 | 46.5, opened 54.5 |
Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Thu, Nov 12, 10:24 PM ET.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team they favor on average.
| Sportsbook | Texas spread | LSU spread | Over | Under | Texas moneyline | LSU moneyline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | +4 −110 | −4 −110 | 46.5 −105 (best price) | 46.5 −115 | +154 | −185 |
| FanDuel | +3.5 +100 | −3.5 −120 | 46.5 −110 | 46.5 −110 (best price) | +146 | −176 |
| BetMGM | +4 −108 | −4 −110 | 46.5 −108 | 46.5 −110 (best price) | +150 | −175 (best price) |
| Caesars | +4 −110 | −4 −109 | 46.5 −106 | 46.5 −114 | +152 | −182 |
| ESPN BET | +4.5 −110 (best price) | −4.5 −110 | 46.5 −105 (best price) | 46.5 −115 | +150 | −175 (best price) |
| BetRivers | +4 −113 | −4 −110 | 46.5 −112 | 46.5 −112 | +143 | −180 |
| Hard Rock Bet | +3.5 −105 | −3.5 −115 (best price) | 46.5 −110 | 46.5 −110 (best price) | +145 | −180 |
| Fanatics | +4 −110 | −4 −110 | 46.5 −110 | 46.5 −110 (best price) | +155 (best price) | −190 |
Odds updated Thu., Nov. 12, 10:24 PM ET. The best price on each bet is marked. Prices move fast, so check the book before you bet. Compare the odds at every sportsbook and build a parlay on CFB Parlay Calculator.
Where the game is won
All three ratings favor LSU, by 1.9 to 3.8 points. LSU's best matchup is their pass rush, 2nd in sack rate, against Texas' pass protection at 124th. Texas' way back in is their run defense, 13th in yards per carry allowed, against LSU's run game at 87th.
Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026; CollegeFootballData.com advanced stats, games through Nov 12, 2026.
Recent form
3–2 in the last five. Won 3 straight.
3–2 in the last five.
Each team's last five games before this one, most recent first.
Injuries and availability
With Winfield, Louisiana went 5–3 and won by 5.3 a game. Without him, this game included, they went 1–0 and won by 21.0 a game.
Where the data comes from. Scores and who played each game from CollegeFootballData.com, games through Nov 12, 2026.
| Week | Opponent | Score | Margin | Winfield played? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | at USC | 30–49 | −19.0 | Yes |
| 3 | vs. UAB | 21–14 | +7.0 | Yes |
| 4 | at Charlotte | 34–7 | +27.0 | Yes |
| 5 | vs. Arkansas State | 23–20 | +3.0 | Yes |
| 6 | at Louisiana Tech | 31–32 | −1.0 | Yes |
| 7 | vs. Troy | 33–6 | +27.0 | Yes |
| 8 | at Southern Miss | 31–35 | −4.0 | Yes |
| 10 | vs. South Alabama | 28–26 | +2.0 | Yes |
| 11 | at UL Monroe | 42–21 | +21.0 | No |
With Armenta, UL Monroe went 2–5 and lost by 17.6 a game. Without him, this game included, they went 0–2 and lost by 13.5 a game. Yards per play: 5.4 with him, 4.3 without.
Where the data comes from. Scores and who played each game from CollegeFootballData.com, games through Nov 12, 2026.
| Week | Opponent | Score | Margin | Armenta played? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | at Mississippi State | 13–62 | −49.0 | Yes |
| 2 | at UAB | 20–26 | −6.0 | No |
| 4 | vs. Florida Atlantic | 17–45 | −28.0 | Yes |
| 5 | at South Alabama | 35–52 | −17.0 | Yes |
| 7 | vs. Louisiana Tech | 0–24 | −24.0 | Yes |
| 8 | at Troy | 21–14 | +7.0 | Yes |
| 9 | vs. Southern Miss | 21–35 | −14.0 | Yes |
| 10 | at Arkansas State | 19–17 | +2.0 | Yes |
| 11 | vs. Louisiana | 21–42 | −21.0 | No |
Statuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Texas and LSU are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Nov 12, 2026.
The players in charts
The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Nov 12, 2026.
RatingsTexas 7–3
On a neutral field, SP+ has Texas 0.6 points better (5th to 7th). PRIME has LSU by 1.3 instead. Elo, which only sees results, also has Texas ahead (7th to 10th).
Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.
Where the data comes from: SP+ by Bill Connelly (CFB Update), last pulled Nov 11, 2026; PRIME (primecfb.com), updated Nov 11, 2026; Elo from CollegeFootballData.com, games through Nov 12, 2026.
Opponent-adjustedLSU 9–7
Texas' offense ranks 65th in adjusted EPA per play, and the LSU defense it faces ranks 9th in EPA per play allowed. LSU's offense ranks 14th against Texas' 4th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge. Adjust for opponents and Texas' offense climbs from 105th to 65th in EPA per play: it has done its work against good defenses.
The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.
Where the data comes from: CollegeFootballData.com advanced stats, games through Nov 12, 2026.
EPALSU 7–1
Texas is better throwing (55th in EPA per pass) than running (118th). LSU's pass defense ranks 10th, so the defense has the better of it. LSU is better throwing (27th in EPA per pass) than running (45th). Texas' pass defense ranks 21st, so that's strength on strength.
Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.
Where the data comes from: CollegeFootballData.com advanced stats, games through Nov 12, 2026.
ScoringEven 1–1
Texas outscores FBS opponents by 13.7 a game, and LSU by 19.4. Texas' offense ranks 48th in scoring, and the LSU defense it faces ranks 19th in points allowed. LSU's offense ranks 18th against Texas' 18th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge.
Per game, FBS opponents only.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026.
OffenseLSU 12–0
Texas has no clear edge here. Their best is 3rd down conversion rate, 67th, against a defense ranked 12th in 3rd down conversions allowed. LSU has no clear edge here. Their best is 3rd down conversion rate, 13th, against a defense ranked 20th in 3rd down conversions allowed.
Per game and per play, from play-by-play.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026.
DefenseTexas 6–5
Texas' defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 13th in yards per carry allowed, and LSU's offense is middle of the pack in yards per carry (87th). That's a mismatch. LSU's defense is best placed to get home: it ranks 2nd in sack rate, and Texas' offense is bottom-20 at avoiding sacks (124th). That's a mismatch.
What opponents managed against them.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026.
Up frontLSU 12–0
LSU has the better number in 12 of 12. The biggest gap is line yards per carry, where LSU ranks 34th and Texas 130th.
The lines. Big Uglies is our rating for each offensive line and each defensive front: adjusted line yards (30%), stuff rate (20%), power success (15%), sack rate (20%) and front-seven havoc (15%), against every FBS team. 50 is average, and every 10 points is a standard deviation. Line stats from CollegeFootballData.com, garbage time out.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026.
TurnoversLSU 4–3
Neither team has a real turnover edge: Texas is −0.4 a game and LSU −0.4.
Per game, from play-by-play.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 12, 2026.
TalentTexas 8–3
Texas has the more talented roster (2nd in the 247Sports talent composite; LSU is 8th). But LSU plays further above their talent: +6.5 points of SP+ beyond what their roster predicts, to Texas' +3.9.
247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.
Where the data comes from: 247Sports, preseason; 247Sports talent composite against SP+ (last pulled Nov 11, 2026); CollegeFootballData.com returning production, preseason; 247Sports recruiting rankings, via CollegeFootballData.com.
MoneyLSU 2–1
Texas' roster is valued at $47.5M, LSU's at $41.4M. Dollar for dollar, LSU plays better: +2.0 points of SP+ above what their payroll predicts, to −0.4 for Texas.
NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.
Where the data comes from: The NIL Standard, preseason estimates; The NIL Standard's preseason roster values against this season's results.
RECEIPTSTexas 3–2
Texas is +2.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is roster (+2.9). LSU is +1.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is roster (+2.1). LSU's record is 1.7 wins worse than their play on bad luck, so they're better than the record says.
Where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.
Where the data comes from: our split of every game result, games through Nov 12, 2026, using SP+ (last pulled Nov 11, 2026), the 247Sports talent composite and CollegeFootballData.com returning production.
The trip
It's Texas' 4th road trip of the season. Counting this one, they'll have traveled 4,266 miles, there and back, 91st of 138 in FBS.
The shortest chain of real results this season that “proves” each team wins.
Texas wins
LSU wins
Each arrow in a chain is a win, with the score and the week. At a neutral site, both teams travel.
Where the data comes from: CollegeFootballData.com schedules and results, games through Nov 12, 2026. Miles as the crow flies, campus to stadium.
FAQ
The numbers pick LSU, 55% chance to win. All three ratings favor the same team. LSU's best matchup is their pass rush, 2nd in sack rate, against Texas' pass protection at 124th.
Sat, Nov 14, 7:30 PM ET at Tiger Stadium (LA). It's on ABC.
SP+ projects LSU 24–22. That's from this season's SP+ offense, defense and special teams ratings, with home field worth 2.5 points.
DraftKings has LSU −4, total 46.5. The numbers pick winners, not bets.
Texas leads 8–7–1. Last meeting: LSU won 45–38 in 2019.
Texas: Arch Manning (2,027 passing yards), Raleek Brown (537 rushing yards) and Ryan Wingo (523 receiving yards). LSU: Sam Leavitt (2,551 passing yards), Dilin Jones (715 rushing yards) and Jackson Harris (800 receiving yards). Season totals through Nov 12, 2026.
Texas' is Arch Manning (2,027 passing yards this season); LSU's is Sam Leavitt (2,551 passing yards this season).
Texas: Colin Simmons (EDGE), questionable.
Keep going
The best charts from the site, by email. Free. Unsubscribe whenever.
Numbers through the games of Nov 12, 2026. SP+ as of Nov 11, 2026. Updated every week.
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team they favor on average.
Where the game is won
Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Recent form
Each team's last five games before this one, most recent first.
Injuries and availability
Statuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
The players in charts
FAQ
Keep going
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.