The numbers sayTemple51% chance to win
Updated
UAB at Temple
Projected score: UAB 26, Temple 31 (total 58).SP+: Temple by 5.2, 64% chance to win.PRIME: Temple by 1.6.
| Margin | Win chance | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SP+ | Temple by 5.2 | 64% | 58 |
| PRIME | Temple by 1.6 | 55% | |
| Elo | UAB | 53% | |
| The line | Temple −2.5 | 48.5, opened 51.5 |
Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Mon, Nov 9, 5:43 PM ET.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team they favor on average.
| Sportsbook | UAB spread | Temple spread | Over | Under | UAB moneyline | Temple moneyline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | +2.5 −110 | −2.5 −110 | 48.5 −112 | 48.5 −108 | +110 | −130 (best price) |
| FanDuel | +2.5 −102 (best price) | −2.5 −120 | 48.5 −110 (best price) | 48.5 −110 | +116 (best price) | −138 |
| BetMGM | +2.5 −102 (best price) | −2.5 −115 | 48.5 −110 (best price) | 48.5 −108 | +115 | −140 |
| Caesars | +2.5 −110 | −2.5 −112 | 48.5 −110 (best price) | 48.5 −112 | +115 | −136 |
| ESPN BET | +2.5 −105 | −2.5 −115 | 48.5 −110 (best price) | 48.5 −110 | +115 | −135 |
| BetRivers | +2 −109 | −2 −114 (best price) | 48.5 −117 | 48.5 −107 | +107 | −132 |
| Hard Rock Bet | +2.5 −115 | −2.5 −105 | 48.5 −115 | 48.5 −105 | +105 | −130 (best price) |
| Fanatics | +2.5 −110 | −2.5 −110 | 49 −110 | 49 −110 (best price) | +115 | −140 |
Odds updated Mon., Nov. 9, 5:43 PM ET. The best price on each bet is marked. Prices move fast, so check the book before you bet. Compare the odds at every sportsbook and build a parlay on CFB Parlay Calculator.
Where the game is won
The ratings split and average out to about 50-50, with Temple ahead by a hair. Temple's best matchup is their offensive line, 2nd in line yards per carry, against UAB's run-stopping front at 117th. UAB's way back in is their pass rush, 8th in sack rate, against Temple's pass protection at 120th.
Temple
UAB
UAB
Temple
UAB
UAB
UAB
UABEach row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 7, 2026; CollegeFootballData.com advanced stats, games through Nov 7, 2026.
Recent form
UAB3–2 in the last five.
Temple1–4 in the last five. Lost 4 straight.
Each team's last five games before this one, most recent first.
Injuries and availability
UAB
TempleStatuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; UAB and Temple are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Nov 7, 2026.
The players in charts
The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Nov 7, 2026.
RatingsUAB 5–4
On a neutral field, SP+ has Temple 2.7 points better (99th to 110th). PRIME has UAB by 0.9 instead. The two ratings split on UAB's defense: 103rd in SP+, 55th in PRIME. Elo, which only sees results, has UAB ahead (93rd to 107th).
Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.
Where the data comes from: SP+ by Bill Connelly (CFB Update), last pulled Nov 2, 2026; PRIME (primecfb.com), updated Nov 9, 2026; Elo from CollegeFootballData.com, games through Nov 7, 2026.
Opponent-adjustedTemple 10–6
UAB's offense ranks 128th in adjusted EPA per play, and the Temple defense it faces ranks 112th in EPA per play allowed. Temple's offense ranks 55th against UAB's 40th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge. The biggest edge on the board is Temple's offensive line in the run game: 2nd in adjusted line yards per carry, against UAB's 117th-ranked defense. That's a mismatch.
The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.
Where the data comes from: CollegeFootballData.com advanced stats, games through Nov 7, 2026.
EPAEven 4–4
UAB is better running (85th in EPA per rush) than throwing (125th). Temple's run defense ranks 94th. Temple is better running (31st in EPA per rush) than throwing (83rd). UAB's run defense ranks 72nd, so that's an edge.
Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.
Where the data comes from: CollegeFootballData.com advanced stats, games through Nov 7, 2026.
ScoringEven 1–1
UAB is outscored by 2.0 a game, and Temple is outscored by 3.4. UAB's offense ranks 112th in scoring, and the Temple defense it faces ranks 101st in points allowed. Temple's offense ranks 92nd against UAB's 62nd-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge.
Per game, FBS opponents only.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 7, 2026.
OffenseTemple 11–1
UAB's best matchup is third downs: their offense ranks 72nd in 3rd down conversion rate, and Temple's defense ranks 125th in 3rd down conversions allowed. Temple's best matchup is their run game: their offense ranks 16th in yards per carry, and UAB's defense ranks 76th in yards per carry allowed. That's a mismatch.
Per game and per play, from play-by-play.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 7, 2026.
DefenseUAB 9–2
UAB's defense is best placed to get home: it ranks 8th in sack rate, and Temple's offense is bottom-20 at avoiding sacks (120th). That's a mismatch. Temple's defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 65th in yards per carry allowed, and UAB's offense is bottom-40 in yards per carry (106th).
What opponents managed against them.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 7, 2026.
Up frontTemple 8–4
Temple has the better number in 8 of 12. The biggest gap is front-seven havoc, where UAB ranks 35th and Temple 135th.
The lines. Big Uglies is our rating for each offensive line and each defensive front: adjusted line yards (30%), stuff rate (20%), power success (15%), sack rate (20%) and front-seven havoc (15%), against every FBS team. 50 is average, and every 10 points is a standard deviation. Line stats from CollegeFootballData.com, garbage time out.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 7, 2026.
TurnoversTemple 4–2
Temple is −0.2 in turnover margin a game and UAB is −0.7. At about five points a turnover, that's roughly a 2-point edge for Temple. Turnover margin rarely holds from one month to the next, so don't count on it.
Per game, from play-by-play.
Where the data comes from: play-by-play from CollegeFootballData.com (the public cfbfastR files), games through Nov 7, 2026.
TalentTemple 6–4
Temple has the more talented roster (80th in the 247Sports talent composite; UAB is 92nd). Temple also plays further above their talent: −5.7 points of SP+ beyond what their roster predicts, to UAB's −6.9.
247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.
Where the data comes from: 247Sports, preseason; 247Sports talent composite against SP+ (last pulled Nov 2, 2026); CollegeFootballData.com returning production, preseason; 247Sports recruiting rankings, via CollegeFootballData.com.
RECEIPTSUAB 4–1
UAB is +0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (−1.4). Temple is −2.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is luck (−1.7). Temple's record is 1.7 wins worse than their play on bad luck, so they're better than the record says.
Where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.
Where the data comes from: our split of every game result, games through Nov 7, 2026, using SP+ (last pulled Nov 2, 2026), the 247Sports talent composite and CollegeFootballData.com returning production.
The trip
It's UAB's 5th road trip of the season. Counting this one, they'll have traveled 4,593 miles, there and back, 85th of 138 in FBS.
The shortest chain of real results this season that “proves” each team wins.
UAB wins
Temple wins
Each arrow in a chain is a win, with the score and the week. At a neutral site, both teams travel.
Where the data comes from: CollegeFootballData.com schedules and results, games through Nov 7, 2026. Miles as the crow flies, campus to stadium.
FAQ
The numbers pick Temple, 51% chance to win. PRIME has Temple; Elo has UAB. Temple's best matchup is their offensive line, 2nd in line yards per carry, against UAB's run-stopping front at 117th.
Sat, Nov 14, 1:00 PM ET at Lincoln Financial Field. It's on ESPN+.
SP+ projects Temple 31–26. That's from this season's SP+ offense, defense and special teams ratings, with home field worth 2.5 points.
DraftKings has Temple −2.5, total 48.5. The numbers pick winners, not bets.
UAB leads 1–0. Last meeting: UAB won 34–24 in 2023.
UAB: Ryder Burton (1,475 passing yards), Roderick Robinson II (551 rushing yards) and C.J. Smith (437 receiving yards). Temple: Ajani Sheppard (1,245 passing yards), Keveun Mason (584 rushing yards) and Colin Chase (381 receiving yards). Season totals through Nov 7, 2026.
UAB's is Ryder Burton (1,475 passing yards this season); Temple's is Ajani Sheppard (1,245 passing yards this season).
Keep going
The best charts from the site, by email. Free. Unsubscribe whenever.
Numbers through the games of Nov 7, 2026. SP+ as of Nov 2, 2026. Updated every week.
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.
Projected vs. what happened
Projected score: SP+, from before kickoff. "Expected" in the game numbers is the average of the offense's numbers and the defense's numbers allowed, in their games before this week. An edge held when the game went the way it pointed.
What we published before kickoff: the pick, the matchups and every stat as it stood going in.
How we picked it
Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team they favor on average.
Where the game is won
Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.
Recent form
Each team's last five games before this one, most recent first.
Injuries and availability
Statuses come from the conference availability reports and team news, as of the date shown. "Hasn't played" means a regular (the main passer, a quarter of the carries or 15% of the catches) with no pass, carry or catch in his team's last two games, from the play-by-play. That can be an injury, a benching or a suspension. Linemen and defenders don't show up in that check.
The teams in charts
The players in charts
FAQ
Keep going
Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.